PROVEN BENEFITS

Research shows that multi-species swards can outperform simpler swards containing only one or two species. We searched the academic literature (1990 – 2019) and identified 77 studies comparing the performance of multi-species swards against a control sward of one or two species.

Performance was measured using a total of 20 factors, relating to forage quality, final product quality or yield, and environmental benefits. Results for the most common factors (used in more than 5 studies) are shown below. There were considerable gaps in the research literature, particularly in relation to the relative environmental impacts of different swards. 

WHAT WE FOUND

  • We found 77 experimental studies comparing a multi-species sward with a one or two species control sward.
  • Studies were located across 25 countries, with 50% in the same climate zone as the UK (oceanic).
  • Approximately half the studies were based on cutting regimes and, half on grazing.
  • Approximately a third of studies used a perennial rye-grass and white clover control sward to compare to compare against multi-species swards.
  • 68% of studies used a chicory-containing multi-species sward
  • The majority of studies showed a performance advantage for the multi-species sward, notably for lamb meat quality, weed suppression, nitrogen leaching and forage quality.
  • The results indicate that our understanding of multi-species swards is incomplete, in particular more research into the environmental performance and stress tolerance potential of multi-species swards is needed.

The graphics below show some of the trends we noted from the various studies for a range of different measures of the performance of diverse swards compared with simpler leys.

FORAGE

Note: Percentages do not add up to a hundred because some studies compared multiple swards

Did diverse forages have a higher Dry Matter yield than the control?

feed
yes 68%
no difference 47%
no 32%

Did diverse forages have a lower Neutral Detergent Fibre level than the control?

Neutral Detergent Fiber molecule over grass
yes 73%
no difference 45%
no 5%

Did diverse forages have a higher digestibility than the control?

dairy cow digestion
yes 50%
no difference 38%
no 25%

Did diverse forages have a a higher Crude Protein level than the control?

amino acid overlaid on clover
yes 33%
no difference 48%
no 29%

PRODUCT YIELDS

Did cows grazing on diverse swards produce a higher milk yield than on the control?

dairy
yes 60%
no difference 40%
no 10%

Were lambs grazing on diverse swards heavier than on the control?

yes 66%
no difference 55%
no 0%

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE

Were diverse swards better at suppressing weeds than the control?

yes 74%
no difference 26%
no 21%

Did multi-species swards have more potential for reducing nitrogen leaching than the control?

nitrogen leaching
yes 66%
no difference 33%
no 0%

ABOUT THE STUDIES

Hover over the images to find out more about studies used for this literature review

50% of studies were in the same oceanic climate zone as UK

45% of studies were based on grazing management

58% of studies involved cutting swards

32% of studies were on beef or dairy enterprises

14% of studies were on sheep enterprises

THE STUDY SWARDS

Environmental Swards

94% of studies used swards with 3-5 species

68% of studies included chicory

61% of studies included red clover

34% of studies included plantain

Control Swards

81% of studies used a binary sward (typically rye-grass and white clover)

52% of studies used a single species sward (e.g. rye-grass)

PERCEPTION SURVEY

PERCEPTION SURVEY

Results from our detailed survey of farmer perceptions of herbal leys, as well as any barriers to uptake.
OUR RESEARCH

OUR RESEARCH

Results from a range of field experiments, including forage quality and mineral content.
TOMS APP & CARDS

TOMS APP & CARDS

Our App & card set helps you identify species, compare their functional traits and monitor swards over time.
ABOUT US

ABOUT US

A summary of what the TOMS project is and how it came about, along with details of the organisations involved.